New Issue: [Library Stabilization] Are the argument names for BigInteger's 'scan0()' and 'scan1()' methods good?

17734, "lydia-duncan", "[Library Stabilization] Are the argument names for BigInteger's 'scan0()' and 'scan1()' methods good?", "2021-05-13T20:52:56Z"

These methods start at the starting_bit and return the first index after that point that is either a 0 (for scan0()) or a 1 (for scan1()). We definitely want to use camelCase instead of snake_case for the argument name, but while adjusting it should we also change the arg name? Maybe to something like startBitIdx?

The definition of the GMP supporting functions can be found here: Integer Logic and Bit Fiddling (GNU MP 6.2.1)