Bug with explicit query on a generic type in an argument lst

Do bugs go here? I am just wrapping up some old work and realise I have a bug to report in 1.29.0 which I am guessing is still around.

It is one of those It's us - not you type.

Bugs can go here but it's probably best to start on Github as that's
where they'll end up anyways


1 Like

Sent to Github. Thanks

1 Like