18010, "bradcray", "Is it OK that Chapel supports coercions from 'c_ptr(t)' to 'c_void_ptr'", "2021-07-01T00:46:04Z"
As we work towards Chapel 2.0, this issue asks whether there are concerns about the fact that Chapel supports implicit coercions from c_ptr(t) to c_void_ptr today. I believe that the traditional rationale for this has been "C supports it, so we should too."