Branch: refs/heads/main
Revision: 9ae0a8f
Author: lydia-duncan
Link: Improve printing of operator methods when printing a call stack at compilation by lydia-duncan · Pull Request #19677 · chapel-lang/chapel · GitHub
Log Message:
Merge pull request #19677 from lydia-duncan/improveOpPrinting
Improve printing of operator methods when printing a call stack at compilation
[reviewed by @vasslitvinov]
Resolves #17539
Prior to this change, if a call failed and reports a call stack involving an operator
method, we would print that operator method as:
called as MyRecord.=(lhs: MyRecord(0), rhs: MyRecord(0)
This was confusing, because the user did not write the call like that and cannot
do so. This change modifies the output so that operator methods are printed
like standalone operators:
called as =(lhs: MyRecord(0), rhs: MyRecord(0)
Add a test to track this output and updated a different one.
Passed a full paratest with futures
Modified Files:
A test/functions/operatorOverloads/operatorMethods/inCallStack.chpl
A test/functions/operatorOverloads/operatorMethods/inCallStack.good
M compiler/AST/FnSymbol.cpp
M test/types/errors/assignTypes.good
Compare: https://github.com/chapel-lang/chapel/compare/e222ec59ff56...9ae0a8fadfc7